Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fat Bloke Sevens
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PeaceNT 17:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fat Bloke Sevens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I tried to speedy this for notability but the author contested it so I brought it here for a consensus. A Yahoo! search does not return much more than local websites. I believe it fails reliable sources independent of the subject as well as significant coverage.--Old Hoss 22:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: NN enough. I would have let the speedy run and I'd bet it would have been deleted. - Rjd0060 22:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find anything on-line that's more than purely local and not especially notable sources; doesn't meet WP:Notable. Accounting4Taste 23:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because a search turns up nothing to support notability. But note that this wouldn't be a speedy candidate: if an article makes any assertion of notability that is not completely bogus — and this does, claiming it has spawned similar events and generated huge interest — then those claims need to be assessed via an AfD and it doesn't fall under CSD:a7. Thomjakobsen 23:40, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable. • Lawrence Cohen 06:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.