Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantal de Chevron-Villette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Chantal de Chevron-Villette

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Chantal de Chevron-Villette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is high time we purged Wikipedia of genealogical entries such as this one. The subject of this article does not seem to have been featured in any reliable sources other than genealogical publications. Surtsicna (talk) 13:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

• Delete the family she married into was removed from power 65 years before her birth. There is nothing covering her that comes even remotely close to rising to the GNG level.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and the other comment above. Totally agree with both, we need to get rid of genealogies about members of deposed ruling families. Smeat75 (talk) 19:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete. 1/3 of this article's sources is to a bare photograph hosted on a blog... JoelleJay (talk) 20:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 17:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
• Delete - I'd normally say to redirect consorts, but this one has such little available to verify anything about her. She's not been in any major scandals nor major philanthropies. She had her picture taken with some people of ill repute, but nothing out of the ordinary. The only fundraising I can find is here. She apparently did some work with Pompeii's restoration, but the coverage was in passing. Redirect if you want to help royalty fans to find her husband's article. Bearian (talk) 20:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.